Showing posts with label National State Local. Show all posts
Showing posts with label National State Local. Show all posts

Friday, December 7, 2012

Levying On Stock Accounts

I am not a lawyer, I am a judgment and debt expert (Judgment and Collection Agency Broker). This article is my opinion, based on my experience in California, and laws vary in each state. If you ever need legal advice or a strategy to use, please contact a lawyer.

Most of the time, judgments are not easy to recover. The most common and cost-effective tools to recover a judgment are bank or employment (wage) levies/garnishments.

Many judgment debtors have assets, however some keep their assets in brokerage accounts. Usually, stocks, bonds, commodities, and similar assets; cannot be reached with a simple levy.

Brokerage account companies include Merrill Lynch, Ameritrade, Scottrade, Ameriprise, Charles Schwab, and Etrade. Like banks, some will accept a levy at any branch or office, others require levies to be served at the branch the account was opened at. Some require you to domesticate the judgment to a state where they do business, others do business in every state, etc.

How do you find out if your judgment debtor owns assets in a brokerage account? Three ways to find this kind of information are:

1) Tips from an ex-spouse, ex-friend, or ex-partner of the judgment debtor.

2) Hire a private investigator, or an asset search firm. This can be expensive.

3) Conduct a court-based judgment debtor exam (OEX) with subpoenas issued for the production of financial, tax, or business records of the debtor, their bank, spouse, and/or business associates. If you find hints about judgment debtor assets at a brokerage firm, then subpoena them for any records pertaining to the judgment debtor. Expect to pay banks and brokerages for their costs in complying with your document requests.

In most states and situations, one cannot usually levy retirement or other protected accounts, or distributions from them; even when they have a judgment for fraud, which makes no sense to me.

What happens after a levy is served on a brokerage, as a third party holding the judgment debtor's assets, is usually very different from a regular bank levy. When a bank is levied, the judgment debtor's assets are cash, a very fungible asset, that is held; then turned over to the sheriff. Then, after a waiting period, the sheriff sends the money onto the creditor.

At a brokerage, after the levy is served, they put a hold on the judgment debtor's account, at least as much as is required to satisfy the levy. However, if the judgment debtor's assets are not in cash, the brokerage does not send any funds to the sheriff automatically. Instead, they wait for a creditor-initiated court order, instructing the brokerage to sell the debtor's stocks and other assets.

When a levy is served, the brokerage confirms any assets that are in the judgment debtor's name, such as stocks. Then, they wait for a court order, instructing them to sell stocks and other assets. Once the court order is received, the judgment debtor's assets are liquidated for cash, and the cash is turned over to the sheriff.

Because brokerage companies are not banks, they are not regulated by Departments of Financial Institutions. Brokerages are regulated primarily by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC"), located in Houston, Texas at http://www.occ.treas.gov.

In certain circumstances, long-arm statues may be used to reach accounts far away from the creditor or the court where the judgment originated.

Long-arm statues allow local state courts have jurisdiction over a non-local entity or person (who is for example, a judgment debtor). The typical test is, whether the debtor or third party (for example, a bank or brokerage) holding the judgment debtor's assets, does or did business local to the court or creditor.

The debtor's stock is usually held in "street name", for example "Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., for the benefit of Barry Debtor".

Uniform Commercial Code, section 8-317, defines creditor's possible rights to judgment debtor's assets at brokerages. Especially if the judgment is large, it is a good idea to hire a lawyer, especially if you have not attempted to levy on a brokerage account before.

What if the brokerage is named and served as the garnishee and ignores, and will not answer your sheriff's levy? I know judgment enforcers, that in this situation, sued the brokerage for the amount they should have held and released to the sheriff, pending a court order.

The brokerage, after being served notice of the creditor's lawsuit, did not file an answer, or show up in court, so a default judgment was obtained against the brokerage.

The judgment enforcer waited for their default judgment to become final. Then, they sent the brokerage a demand letter, telling them that they could either pay, or the judgment would be domesticated to their state, and the sheriff would seize their assets. The brokerage paid, however there is no guarantee this would work in your situation.

An alternative to levying the brokerage where the judgment debtor maintains an account, is to obtain a turnover order for all shares of stock owned at a brokerage, as of the date of the turnover order. One problem is that many debtors will move their assets, as soon as they are served a copy of the court-approved turnover order, violating the court's order.

Prior to, or at the same time the turnover order is served, one could serve a court-approved temporary restraining order (TRO), preventing the debtor from doing anything, except for withdrawing funds and turning them over to the sheriff.

Then, if the judgment debtor does not comply with the court order, you can request an order to show cause "re: contempt". If your debtor violates the restraining order or the turnover order, what happens next depends on what state you are in, and which judge you get.

Too often, contempt of civil court orders have very little ramifications for the contemptee. Once again, especially if the judgment or assets are large, it is a good idea to retain a lawyer.

Separation Agreement: Why Do a Financial Separation Agreement Before Going to a Solicitor?   Judgment Debtor Hubby Exams   Are Civil Bench Warrants Worth Getting?   Judicial Council Forms Hold Clues To California Procedural Questions   

Use A Legal Document Preparer?

I am not a lawyer, I am a judgment referral expert (Judgment Broker). This article is my opinion, based on my experience in California, and laws vary in each state. Nothing in any of my articles should ever be considered legal advice. If you ever need legal advice or a strategy to use, you should contact a lawyer.

In this article, when LDP is used, it means a Legal Document Preparer or Legal Document Preparation. In this article, LDP also means Legal Document Assistant (LDA), which means almost the same thing - a person with education and training, who is usually state licensed. What a LDP can or cannot do depends on which state they are operating in. In some states, State Bars have stopped LDAs from helping people.

LDPs do not offer a legal service, however they can help you fill out the court's or the sheriff's legal forms. Sometimes LDPs are also process servers, court researchers, or court runners - and can sometimes file or serve your documents.

LDPs do not, and cannot offer legal advice. Most will not even give you their direct opinion, because that might be too close to being considered an Unauthorized Practice Of Law. (See Business and Professions Code Section 6400 A.) LDPs usually will not select forms for you. Instead, they can refer you to pre-printed brochures and flyers, with the same information that a web search would show.

The legal situation when at LDPs, is similar to when you are at a court clerk's window. Neither of them can give you legal advice, but both can show you to where you can learn what to do, and then you can come back and tell them what you want done. (Usually they will tell you when you fill out something wrong, however they still cannot give you legal advice.)

Depending on which state, some people hire LDPs for do-it-yourself divorce, unlawful detainer, lawsuits, bankruptcies, wills, judgment enforcement, and many other tasks where one wants help to do the legal forms or tasks themselves.

The primary advantage of using an LDP is they can save you money. If your needs are simple and there are no complications, and you know what you are doing, you can save a lot of money using a LDP.

In some states, where lawyers take very few judgment recovery cases on contingency, and collection agencies charge too much upfront and too much as a percentage, and/or judgment enforcers have been put out of business by state bars (or have become too picky), or where small claims judgments cannot be assigned, LDAs can be a solution to try to get judgments recovered.

There are many disadvantages to using a LDP:

1) If your case or task has any kind of complication or opposition, you may have to pay a lawyer the same, or more money, than if you went to them first, and you will also have already paid the LDP.

2) Just because you can do something legally does not mean you should. A good lawyer can advise you about whether it is worth trying something, a LDP cannot.

3) Lawsuits can be won, and judgments can be recovered on a contingency basis. Contingency is an important concept and LDPs are not contingency. Contingency lets you spend no money and no time, and someone else works and pays to get your goal accomplished. LDPs are always pay as you go.

4) If you pay for a LDA to help you recover your judgment, often you must also pay for a private investigator, and pay courts, sheriffs, and process servers.

Good web sites to learn more are: Wikipedia and in California, http://www.calda.org/Information.asp

Separation Agreement: Why Do a Financial Separation Agreement Before Going to a Solicitor?   Judgment Debtor Hubby Exams   Are Civil Bench Warrants Worth Getting?   Judicial Council Forms Hold Clues To California Procedural Questions   

Twitter Facebook Flickr RSS



Français Deutsch Italiano Português
Español 日本語 한국의 中国简体。